Skip to Content

Understanding Investment Advisors’ Fiduciary Duty to Individual Investors

July 2, 2018 Blog

As an individual investor, you are entitled to a number of important protections under federal law. One of these protections exists in the form of the “fiduciary duty” that investment advisors owe to their clients.

Fundamentally, the fiduciary duty requires investment advisors to act in their clients’ best interests when providing advice and making trades on their clients’ account. As summarized by the former Director of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations, the fiduciary duty establishes five primary obligations for investment advisors:

  • To always put investors’ interests first;
  • To act with the “utmost good faith;”
  • To provide complete disclosure of facts that are material to investment decisions;
  • To refrain from providing investors with misleading information (either intentionally or unintentionally); and,
  • To disclose all conflicts of interest.

Where Does Investment Advisors’ Fiduciary Duty Come From?

While it is well-established that investment advisors’ fiduciary duty exists under Section 206(3) of the Investment Advisor Act of 1940, this law does not actually use the word, “fiduciary.” Instead, the fiduciary standard that applies to investment advisors exists as a result of a U.S. Supreme Court decision from 1963. In the case of SEC v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, the Court stated:

“The Investment Advisers Act of 1940 . . . reflects a congressional recognition ‘of the delicate fiduciary nature of an investment advisory relationship,’ as well as a congressional intent to eliminate, or at least to expose, all conflicts of interest which might incline [an] investment adviser . . . to render advice which was not disinterested.”

Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, federal courts around the country have consistently held investment advisors to this fiduciary standard. When investment advisors breach their fiduciary duty, clients who suffer financial harm are entitled to recover their investment losses.

Investment Advisor vs. Investment Broker

Importantly, while investment advisors owe a fiduciary duty to their clients, investment brokers generally do not. While there has been much debate over whether the SEC should subject brokers to a fiduciary standard in recent years, to date no pertinent laws or regulations have been adopted. As a result, as an individual investor, it is important to know whether you are working with a broker or an advisor. If you are working with an investment broker, you are essentially working with a salesperson who works on commission. If you are working with an investment advisor, then you can expect to receive investment recommendations that have been conceived with your best interests in mind.

If you are not sure whether you are working with an investment broker or an investment advisor, you can review our Checklist and Questions to Ask When Choosing an Investment Broker or Advisor, and you can click here to learn about other ways to recover fraudulent investment losses.

Speak with an Investment Fraud Attorney at Zamansky, LLC

At Zamansky, LLC, we are a team of experienced attorneys who exclusively represent individual investors in securities litigation and FINRA arbitration. If you have suffered unexpected and unexplained losses and would like to speak with an attorney, we encourage you to call (212) 742-1414 or contact us online for a free consultation.

Client Reviews

“Jake Zamasky and his colleagues represented me in a FINRA arbitration case against a large multinational bank and succeeded in obtaining an award for the full amount of my investment losses. I would highly recommend the Zamansky firm for their experience in securities litigation, their level of detailed research and case preparation, and their ability to effectively fight for what’s right.”

Richard R.

“Throughout my entire case, Jake Zamansky was incredibly responsive and spent time walking me through each step of the process. He is professional and worked with my challenging schedule, even meeting with me nights and on weekends. He knew exactly which turn to take when it came to my case and yet was respectful of any decisions I wanted to make resulting in a positive outcome.”

Donald A.

“Jake Zamansky and his firm represented me in a FINRA arbitration case to recover investment losses. Jake and his team were very professional and worked very hard preparing for trial and then reaching a substantial settlement of our case. I would highly recommend them.”

William E.

“Jake Zamansky represented me in a FINRA arbitration case which allowed me to recover a substantial portion of investment losses. He is truly an expert in this space and I would highly recommend him to those investors who may have been been a victim of investment fraud.”

Chris K.

“Jake and his team did a great job communicating with me throughout the process of my lawsuit. I would recommend him to anyone looking to sue UBS for unethical practices.”

Mike A.
View More